“The podcast is just straight up anecdotal evidence with absolutely no science behind anything.
Even the opinions given aren’t interesting or unique in the slightest. It’s all stuff you’ve heard 1000 times before.
“Why don’t you use read receipts?”
“So people don’t know I’ve seen their message”
The ‘conflicting’ opinions the hosts often have (which seems entirely faked / added to try and attach an extra layer of appeal) have boring opinions.
They will take two popular stances and state them. That’s it. They then try and milk the show for 20 minutes by restating those same opinions over and over.”
Sir Picasso via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/07/17