“This podcast is pretty addictive, which I don’t say very often. The case itself is extremely compelling and lends itself to true crime storytelling. My only feedback is that the editing doesn’t drive home the key points, and it’s easy to get lost with who is speaking or what we should be paying attention to during long uncut interview sessions, especially as many of the voices sound similar. Sometimes Sheila chimes in with a comment that something is “interesting” but she doesn’t expand on what is going on in her mind or why she wanted to point it out. As a listener i was interested to know what connections were being made in Sheila’s mind at these pivotal points. I think it would have been easier to follow if the audio segments had been interspersed with supportive commentary from Sheila to help us stay on track with who is speaking and what we are learning and how it relates to the overall timeline and predominant theories. I also was extremely surprised that sheila didn’t lead with the stronger evidence from the autopsy or the dummy being tossed over the cliff. I’m curious why she chose to omit it. For example, the triangular postmortem imprint on Lauren’s chest is hugely important, but I only learned about it on reddit. Why didn’t we dig further into the currents and how they undermine the campers story? Overall, I think Sheila is selling her investigation short by leaving out some of the very thorough work she did in this investigation, and by allowing the interview recordings to speak for themselves but not really letting us in on the meat of the investigation, which is her personal thought process as she stacks up the clues in favor or against each possible scenario.”
Fhknvcfgbjjb via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/17/18