Smugness and poor format overpower content
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I listenend to maybe 6 or 7 episodes of this, really tried to give it a chance, but could not stand it.
The neuroscientist of the title comes across as smug, arrogant and dismissive. What's worse is that he explains very little. He seems to have very little regard for the ideas or knowledge of guest specialists unless he knew or believed it in advance.His approach to guests is solely to satisfy his own (feigned?) curiosity - he doesn't bother to ask about things the listener might want to know.
Finally, his foil in all this is supposedly the show's producer, whose role is to play an idiot who wishes he wasn't there and "blimey, guv'nor! Who'da thought that, then?!"
The overall feel is that nobody at the Guardian cares much about podcasts - they just do it because they're told to.”Read full review »
dettifoss via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
05/13/18
More reviews of A Neuroscientist Explains
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Really missing these podcasts, I’ve listening to them all so many times and love them”
S-Tara via Apple Podcasts ·
New Zealand ·
05/23/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Absolutely love it and can’t wait for more”
hstw12334 via Apple Podcasts ·
Spain ·
06/17/21
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
.jpg)
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
