“Reviewing podcasts for the general public is ineffective when the ones doing the critiquing have a negative bias about the podcast and/or genre prior to reviewing the podcast (aka Rob Has A Podcast). Taking an unbiased approach when critiquing would be much more beneficial for the audience.
Also, calling out Rob for not knowing a fact (something about 1000 year old man v 2000 year old man) and then misstating what Rob got wrong (albeit he did admit to misstating Rob; however, it was probably something too trivial to mention on the podcast since it happens on every podcast), as well as stating incorrect facts (assuming he won survivor and only podcasting to boost his ego) certainly does not help a listener's experience.
After seeing the glaring holes in the review of RHAP, I am hesitant on using this podcast as a source to find other podcast.”
Abc123def456fed321cba via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/07/14