DNA
With all of these witnesses are similar and conflicting memory recalls. No one can accurately think back 25 years ago. Each witness will have a slight recollection of of what they have seen. No one can tell the absolute truth in this matter, just many individuals accounts. For example ie: I remember being drunk 20 years ago and seeing this or that ! DNA evidence is the only thing that will put Edwards to justice. The way the dectives put it together and nothing else. Or a confession by Edwards. It’s like the prosecution is trying to get that
Bomberblitz13 via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 12/05/19
More reviews of CLAREMONT: The Trial
I have an interest in this case. The reporting is way too emotive. Stories of this nature require facts and facts alone “terror”, “evil” etc. are poor choice of words to use. If you are going to use an interview from someone who was around at the time use someone other than Mr Zempilis and...Read full review »
Edgeledge via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 03/05/19
This is a perfect introduction to what will be the biggest trial in the history of Western Australia. Gary’s knowledge of the Claremont serial killer case teamed with audio from the time of the crimes makes for a podcast which will leave you wanting more.
Matt commander via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 03/01/19
A few more facts wouldn’t go astray. Be keen to see how the rest of this podcast goes.
Diddy Dowd via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 11/25/19
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »