Unequaled Coverage By Two Phenomenal Scholars
As a rule, I don’t review podcasts - I’ve never done so before, and I will likely not do so again. Divided Argument warrants an exception. For a podcast that markets itself as “unscheduled and unpredictable,” it is uncanny how Will and Dan’s commentary never manages to be untimely, uncouth, or unsophisticated. To the contrary, both professors consistently serve as fantastic foils to one another, drawing deep insights from each other’s sometimes (but not always) conflicting arguments. This podcast blows its competition out of the water, and if you are seeking a source for thoughtful analysis about the Supreme Court and its docket, look no further.
Akzka27 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 06/23/23
More reviews of Divided Argument
Dan Epps has really gone off the deep end. In the episode “Settling of Scores,” he tries to explain some conspiracy theory that allows him (and others) to ascribe bad faith those who have ideas he does not like. It’s really something to behold and Will is so polite to not only poke a few holes...Read full review »
MLS11MLS via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/11/22
I love this. You could occasionally do a look back at key decisions from each court that are still used as precedent.
LesaTRx via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/15/21
As a big fan of First Mondays before it fell apart and who has been searching for a replacement ever since, to me this podcast is its spiritual successor. It’s a factual discussion on the Court,their rulings and machinations in an approachable way with minimal political spin. The hosts are...Read full review »
H.Jones1988 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 01/25/22
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »