More (viewpoint) diversity please
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Excellent hosts and generally a good selection of guests. However, all participants tend to be in violent agreement with each other (with very rare exceptions). I would be particularly interested in a more vigorous, nuanced debate on the ethics of representing problematic clients (as opposed to softball questions to some of the guests so far, along the lines of ‘Would you agree that the media misunderstand the public service you render in representing oligarchs?’).”
anton-m via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
02/04/23
More reviews of Double Jeopardy
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Love this podcast informative & fascinating.”
grangepark2 via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
10/22/22
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I listen to this because it covers legal matters related to the news in a calm way. There is a genuine exploration in the conversations, it’s not combative, although opinions differ sometimes. The people presenting the podcast know what they are talking about: it’s not just “ opinions “ but a...”Read full review »
Ciloyt via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
04/10/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Very interesting examination of legal issues of relevance to everyone, not only lawyers, without political party point-scoring.
Appreciate the new-and-improved audio equipment! Thank you.”
Trvski via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
10/22/23
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
Patreon
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
