Naive perspective on circumstantial evidence
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Disappointed about how James has painted circumstantial evidence. Naive perspective. The way circumstantial evidence is often used by prosecutors is to tell a story when their is no actual hard evidence; cheap trick prosecutors use to get their win, conviction and promotion. This often results in wrongful convictions! This may or may not have happened to Scott Peterson - he was certainly tried in the media and not a courtroom. There is of course a place for circumstantial evidence, but it is a slippery slope and needs to accompany hard factual evidence.
Usually love this podcast, but disappointed today!”
SAY678 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/20/23
More reviews of Hide and Seek
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Very well done and evident that the moderator is very thoughtful and cares about this case & being respectful!! So glad I found this!!”
S-Nick40 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/12/19
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“You bit off up and vanished” podcast pretty hard....”
Augusta87 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
06/29/19
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Wow, nicely done! Great production! It’s very evident that a lot of time and effort has gone into this! Looking forward to the episodes to come!!”
erobinson51 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/14/19
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
