Have they abandoned the actual analysis part?
I was a HUGE fan of this show for the first few seasons. Super insightful and just well constructed, and the access to courtroom audio was incredible. But the format seems to have morphed from “courtroom audio plus fantastic insights that shed light on the legal process” to “just courtroom audio with à tiny bit of description of that audio, zero analysis to go with it.” The additional problem with this is that the actual content of recent trials they have covered is SO MUCH LESS COMPELLING than the Robert Durst trial that the audio alone just isn’t worth the listen, especially with zero analysis to help liven it up. Wish I could have à more positive review to leave; just listen to the first few seasons.
Stella Belikiewicz via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 06/17/23
More reviews of Jury Duty
I think this has been a very interesting podcast, but when you know it’s bad audio and you actually say “this audio is the best I can do because of x,y,z” you could at least repeat what they said. You could say “I’m case your didn’t catch that, she/he said …. and repeat it”. Trying to be helpful.
mrgkay via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/18/21
I have loved your previous trials but not enjoying the Rittenhouse as there seems to be biased reporting. It’s very evident you believe Kyle got preferential treatment.
Betty A C via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 03/07/22
Avoids all the schlock of so many other over-emoting, manipulative true crime podcasts. This actually is journalism—not fiction posing as such.
brooklynmuse79 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/23/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »