Intellectual blindness
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“If you want to be fed a preordained narrative, this podcast - entertaining enough for what it is - will serve you well. For instance, after quoting Curtis LeMay discussing how harm and suffering can be minimised through decisive action, this clown cites that as evidence of LeMay being cold-blooded. Whether or not LeMay is mistaken in application, how is a considered intent to cause the least possible overall suffering cold-blooded. I guesss evidence doesn't matter when the answer is already decided. There is none so blind as will not see.”Read full review »
SvonR via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
02/20/21
More reviews of Revisionist History
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“There a lot of great history podcast out there. This is a podcast that leans so far left, I believe he will cut off his right arm to prove his loyalty. So, if you're looking for a fair, unbiased, and balanced look at history, look somewhere else.”Read full review »
BillyNilly via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
06/16/16
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Gladwell is educational, thorough and entertaining - as usual”
IUKnight via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
06/16/16
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Really well produced. But there's absolutely no reason to call this revisionist history when you are just relating historical facts.”Read full review »
.....I don't want a nickname via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
06/16/16
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
