More Case Details Needed
SCOTUS101 is one of my fav podcasts. However, I’d like way more in-depth coverage of cases before the bench, and on decisions. These case details are the meat and potatoes of what I want to hear. The interview portion is more like lettuce/no tomatoes and green beans (meh). I listen to the first 8-10 minutes of the case details, then usually skip to the trivia and then call it good. Not so interested in a 30-minute interview of someone I’ve never heard of. I love Amy and GuanCarlo though (as I did the previous hosts too).
Pikes Maximus via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 12/04/20
More reviews of SCOTUS 101
Tiffany and Elizabeth’s interviews are top notch. Great guests. Great questions. Great trivia!
SCOTUS Nerd via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 03/08/18
Heritage continues to produce really excellent content in podcast format, SCOTUS 101 being probably their best. If you, like several of this podcast’s recent reviewers, find it shocking that the Heritage Foundation would produce content from an obviously conservative perspective, well, you’re an...Read full review »
N|B_|GC via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 11/14/18
I thoroughly enjoyed Amy’s stirring comments about what Justice Barrett’s elevation to SCotUS means to her. As a father of two young daughters, I look forward to the day they discover the trail that Justice Barrett is blazing.
mako_mark via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 10/30/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »