Impulsivity, Imaptience, and Risk Taking: A Discounting Perspective
Listen now
Description
Green, Leonard. and Myerson, Joel. - IImpulsivity, Imaptience, and Risk Taking: A Discounting Perspective - People discount the value of delayed or uncertain outcomes, and the same mathematical function describes both delay and probability discounting. The degree to which individuals discount is thought to reflect how impulsive they are. from this perspective, steep discounting of delayed outcomes (which fails to maximize long-term welfare) and shallow discounting of probabilistic outcomes (which fails to adequately take risk into account) reflect similar decision-making processes and also the same trait of impulsivity. However, several manipulations selectively affect delay and probability discounting, and correlational studies show that how steeply one discounts delayed rewards is relatively independent of how steeply one discounts probabilistic rewards. Thus referring to both delay and probability discounting as measures of 'impulsivity' may serve only to indicate that real behavioral problems can involve either kind of discounting. This tutorial will highlight the similarities and differences between delay and probability discounting as well as the implications of both experimental and correlational findings on discounting and impulsivity.
More Episodes
Drossell, Claudia - Early experimentalists such as Arzin,Ferster, Sidman and many more, had a vision of exploring laboratory-derived operant principles to clinical practice settings. Syetematically exploring the possibilities inherent in behavior analytic assessments and interventions, these...
Published 03/20/15
Gottlieb, Daniel - Last year, I talked about the bredth of the Pavlovian process before discussing the different types ofPavlovian stimuli and how they might not all be equally amenable to intervention. This year, my focus is on how Pavlovian processes may be a driving forcein a number of areas...
Published 03/19/15
Friman, Patrick - Interpreting common child behavior problems as evidence of psychopathology is routine in mainstream psychology. The practice is so widespread that when investigators fail to obtain clinically significant levels of behavior problems, as indexed by standard scores on assessment...
Published 03/19/15