“The information here is incredible. This isn’t news one can walk outside and obtain. It’s hard hitting, up-to-date, boots-on-the-ground news which is brought to us sitting on our couches from a pool of journalists who some have risked lives to obtain It should be commended. Those harking on the logo seem to miss the point, while simultaneously seemingly unappreciative of the free insights provided. From a design perspective, the logo is a knockout, indicating in one picture a fractured state, a country being torn apart. It’s rather ingenious and I don’t think it’s rude or in bad taste. It conveys specifically what the content is, in a simple idea. If one is going to boycott or take a stand against a conduit for information, there should be an issue with the information itself, not how it’s packaged. From a design perspective, I can’t see how you would relate the content within any better. Now, if Ukrainians en mass have an issue with how it’s portrayed, then maybe listen to them but I’m pretty sure Ukrainians would rather you hear the content within then debate the logo out front. I doubt anyone could design a logo that echoes a country in the throes of a bombed out takeover attempt any better.”
I swear by it via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/18/22