“(Spoilers) the only evidence that they present as “evidence” of his “innocence” is that people say he “seems like he’s a nice guy who couldn’t do it”. They never take on any of the prosecution’s evidence! Bullets? Gloves? Son not defending his father on the stand? Hairs found? Agenda page is wrong date? Cho’s lies during interrogation? NOTHING is explained except he “seemed” like he couldn’t have done it. You have to be a sociopath on some level to financially defraud people around you, and a great liar if nothing else. There are so many people wrongfully incarcerated, why spend the time on this guy. Plus, male hosts voice is painful. Don’t waste your time.”
Hanawest via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/17/23