Patchy - often pretty superficial
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Often disappointing - they sound like they should be good, but are often too superficial.
One on electric cars is a good example. They fail to even discuss the question of where the electricity comes from - they sort of assume that it is zero carbon. For people who live in areas where there is still lots of carbon fired electricity, in particular at night where it is most of the supply, the carbon impact of an electric car charged at night is not insignificant. But totally ignored in this episode.”
Elephantoplasty via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
02/28/24
More reviews of Science Weekly
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
Bhooradley via Apple Podcasts ·
Canada ·
11/13/10
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Good range of subjects but poor delivery. Slow, simplistic with long empty pauses filled with background irrelevant music.”
Canunotcy via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
08/28/18
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This is a great podcast for those looking to stay informed on the latest science news. The overviews helps keep track of what is changing, and the depth helps understand why the news is important (or not important.) Keep up the good work. Cheers from the Midwest of America.”
36nurseman via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/27/08
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
