“I spoke with this journalist toward the end of her recording of this podcast and she was wholly uninterested in anything positive. It was clear she had a specific agenda.
I know every single person interviewed here and have first hand knowledge of the stories told in this podcast. The amount of twisted untruths and agenda, as well as the supposed *experts* in this podcast is shoddy and incomplete journalism.
This podcast comes no where close to upholding the standards of Ethics of Journalism and is really no better than a tabloid media rag. It is shocking the BBC would support something like this, but hey everyone needs click bait to stay relevant today!
In my conversation with this journalist she is only interested in the story that women are victims in both this conversation and beyond. She has zero appreciation for the practice, the Feminine, or transformation.
I personally witnessed statements made in the Bloomberg article retracted by people who said them in their own musings and further explanations and I imagine we will see that develop over time.
This podcast is slanderous and defamatory in every sense of the words.
If you listen to this you should ask yourself why a full picture would not be presented. Why the majority of the people interviewed haven’t been around or part of the community for years. You should ask yourself why the journalist would reject accounts that were positive to be presented in full. You should ask yourself about the credibility of the sources and the stories.”
@bethebutterfly via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/24/21