Episode 24: Shaping Insight stories
Listen now
Description
When the Insight forums first met, the prevailing thinking was that analysis and research projects should be conducted and then written up as if they were scientific experiments. Market research reports in particular would start with a reference to the brief that had been received; then talk about the methodology selected; the research activity carried out; the data collated and tables of findings. And finally, if you were lucky, some observations and conclusions. This was a very logical way of approaching the task, but it’s a very passive way of communicating. If we start with the brief and methodology, rather than business recommendations, it’s also likely to reinforce stakeholders’ perception that an Insight team is a reactive service function.
More Episodes
Episode 50 of the IMA's Transforming Insight podcast is now available. In this extended episode, James talks to Carolina Otero, Head of the Insight Function at Nestle UK. Carolina is one of our few podcast guests whose journey into Insight was not an accident, but a conscious choice. Bringing us...
Published 06/06/24
Published 06/06/24
Over the last few weeks, we’ve explored the first three pathways that successful Insight teams have taken to improve their position in the hearts, minds and decision-making processes of their companies. We’ve called these brand, awareness and reputation, and each involves looking at our Insight...
Published 05/23/24