Alarmists at its best
A simplistic version presented by Mr Crowley which is not supported by all the facts presented at trial of Sica. Just one example is the discovery of the foot prints. Mr Crowley is negligent in his commentary of exactly how detectives identified the foot prints evolved. Had he done more research of the evidence he would have relieved himself of the suspicion they were somehow manufactured by police. Mr Crowley glosses over the in-depth investigation conduct by detectives that eliminated all identified persons of interest except for Sica.
WarrenNoel via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 02/26/24
More reviews of True Crime Conversations
Excellent narration from Jessie Stephens and the choice of guests for their stories behind these crimes is outstanding. I have particularly like the Azaria Chamberlain case, sensitively reviewed.
Miss Niqi via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 09/25/19
I’ve listened to many podcasts in the “true crime” genre and this is refeshingly consise and clear. There’s no repetition, banal commentary or inane and childish questions from the host. Rather, the guests get straight into the story, presenting it in a factual narrative which is so interesting...Read full review »
Elveecatnapper via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 11/27/19
Finally a podcast that is clear, concise, informative...no ridiculous laughing, swearing, or assinine juvenile comments.. hallelujah!!
Cedararbutus via Apple Podcasts · Canada · 10/19/19
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »