Dr. Jonathan Howard and Wendy Orent dive into the criticisms and negative reviews they have received for their podcast. They discuss accusations of ad hominem attacks and misrepresentations made by doctors they have quoted in their discussions on pandemic policies and vaccination strategies. Dr. Howard begins by acknowledging the seriousness of the pandemic and the consequences of words spoken during such times. He highlights that some individuals treated the pandemic as a game, engaging in personal attacks instead of focusing on constructive discussions. The main focus of the episode is responding to a negative review they received from Christian Siegel, who criticized their representation of the Great Barrington Declaration supporters' views on vaccination and pandemic policies. Dr. Howard uses this review as a starting point to address similar criticisms he has received. Dr. Howard points out that his podcast has not engaged in ad hominem attacks or insults, but rather aims to accurately quote and discuss the views of doctors and experts. He quotes Winston Churchill, emphasizing the importance of free speech and the willingness to accept responses and disagreements. The episode highlights the common responses Dr. Howard has received from doctors he has quoted. These responses include ignoring his work, resorting to juvenile insults, and misrepresenting his views. Dr. Howard addresses each of these responses, providing examples from his interactions with specific doctors. One notable example is Dr. Stephan Baral, who accused Dr. Howard of promoting his book during the pandemic. Dr. Howard counters this claim and questions the idea that writing a book during the pandemic is a path to riches. Another doctor, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, is cited for misrepresenting Dr. Howard's views and engaging in personal attacks. Dr. Howard provides evidence of Bhattacharya's inaccurate representations and questions his stance on vaccination for children. The episode also delves into the criticisms made by Dr. Francis Ballou, a virologist and chair of computational biology at University College London. Dr. Ballou accused Dr. Howard of misrepresenting views and being a grifter with no domain expertise. Dr. Howard challenges these accusations and highlights the importance of accurately quoting experts. This sheds light on the challenges and criticisms faced by Dr. Jonathan Howard and Wendy Orent. It emphasizes the need for respectful dialogue and open discussion during a pandemic. Resources mentioned: The Great Barrington Declaration Winston Churchill quote on free speech Dr. Stephan Baral's Twitter comments Dr. Jay Bhattacharya's articles and comments Dr. Francis Ballou's criticisms and accusations Connect with us further on jonathanhowardmd.com  The Fine Print: The content presented in the "We Want Them Infected" Podcast and associated book is intended for informational and educational purposes only.    The views and opinions expressed by the speakers, hosts, and guests on the podcast do not necessarily reflect the views of the creators, producers, or distributors. The information provided in this podcast should not be considered as a substitute for professional medical, scientific, or legal advice. Listeners and readers are encouraged to consult with relevant experts and authorities for specific guidance and information.   The creators of the podcast and book have made reasonable efforts to ensure that the information provided is accurate and up to date. However, as the field of medical science and the understanding of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to evolve, there may be new developments and insights that are not covered in this content.   The creators are not responsible for any errors or omissions in the content or for any actions taken based on the information provided. They disclaim any liability for any loss, injury, or damage incurred by individuals who rely on the content.   Listeners and