5-4
Unlistenable, mostly because of the girl’s giggling
I enjoy learning about seminal court cases, but found that the podcasters’ giggling and use of “like” and “f#%*” (I’m afraid Apple might censor this review if I include the actual word) ruined their credibility. No one disputes the problem of entrenched racism within police forces, but the repeated nicknaming of the Staten Island cop, with its allusions to police being from certain ethnic groups, portrays the authors as just as prejudiced. Is the giggling girl (she doesn’t act like a woman) stoned? Did she recently inhale helium? Discussions of subject matter such as this warrant more mature treatment.
Vanessa123456780 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 03/28/20
More reviews of 5-4
I thought it was pretty good. Like, I've definitely listened to worse podcasts.Read full review »
Ddh060 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 03/26/20
I didn’t learn anything from this podcast, and I’m disappointed I wasted my time listening to 4 and a half of the episodes hoping I would eventually enjoy it. Compounding my annoyance with this pointless and patronizing show is that hosts are neither as funny nor as smart as they clearly believe...Read full review »
Joanna1016 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 03/26/20
Other, better SCOTUS podcasts feature expert analysis from top lawyers with actual SCOTUS experience. Not sure if the hosts of this slog have even been inside the Supreme Court building. The first two episodes offer warmed-over "legal realist" analysis of cases that have been analyzed in...Read full review »
ArmandWillis via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 03/06/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »