They should hire someone to do research
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This podcast lacks research on what the basis and background of many cases actually are. It makes it tough to know what is true and what is their conjecture. There is very little nuance and many of their arguments and statements do not stand up to gentle questioning or research”
wiscolegend via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/19/23
More reviews of 5-4
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Far less efficient than reading the Bush versus Gore Wikipedia article yourself, which seems to be all these lawyers did.”
JerryGarcia808 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/26/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Other, better SCOTUS podcasts feature expert analysis from top lawyers with actual SCOTUS experience. Not sure if the hosts of this slog have even been inside the Supreme Court building. The first two episodes offer warmed-over "legal realist" analysis of cases that have been analyzed in...”Read full review »
ArmandWillis via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/06/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I was really hoping for an unbiased point of view, even though I know the SCOTUS is biased. Rather seeking to understand the other side, they look to put down. I’m not a Republican or Democrat, but the vile attacks on the Republican Party from these podcasters makes them sympathetic. If you’re...”Read full review »
Dvdgrsnbch via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/28/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
