Unfortunately it’s losing the science
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Even though shorter, the old version of the podcast had more actual science and facts in it. The new one is mostly devoid of the details and is pretty handwavy. It seems like the new one is targeting a completely scientifically non-savvy audience. But this is Scientific American! Give your audience some credit for knowledge!”
Usability guy via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/22/23
More reviews of Science, Quickly
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I don't have the time or the inclination to listen to the longer podcasts. However I am interested in the current affairs in science. These minute long podcasts are ideal for learning a lot in a short period of time. As well as the informative angle they are delivered with a sense of humour...”Read full review »
gbgenius via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
08/31/07
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This is a good podcast that has some great information. It's on my "start the day podcast list" which includes various other news programs. First thing that irks me: the ads--sometimes the ads are in front of the podcast and other times the ads are completely nonexistent. When...”Read full review »
skihigh2002 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/25/07
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This podcast goes wrong,all resouces have the same content.”
Guan He via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/12/11
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
