Thanks Jama and Contributors
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Most articles are high quality and/or meaningful. The podcast is well worth listening to and a blessing to society. Thanks putting in the effort to make this available. Keep doing hard work!”
tim-qwerty098 via Apple Podcasts ·
Canada ·
12/22/21
More reviews of JAMA Editors' Summary
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Just tuned in this week for the first time, so very disappointed to hear at the end of the podcast that the editor intends to continue as the reader/personality. I found it grating; humor that falls completely flat, and a singsong reading style that just doesn't convey meaning very well. I...”Read full review »
MarkSelden via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/18/09
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I prefer a single voice throughout the podcast, I can understand the appeal to some of having authors speak about their articles, but it makes it harder for me to follow. I like your podcast because of the single voice format, not in spite of it.”
flyingpoodle via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
08/17/17
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The ‘host’ maters. Thank you Ed and JAMA podcast staff for this high quality output. The way your podcasts are edited and presented is an example for NEJM and Annals podcasts.
Ibrahim,
New Zealand”
Ibzal via Apple Podcasts ·
New Zealand ·
10/15/19
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
