Great summaries, old format better.
I prefer a single voice throughout the podcast, I can understand the appeal to some of having authors speak about their articles, but it makes it harder for me to follow. I like your podcast because of the single voice format, not in spite of it.
flyingpoodle via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 08/17/17
More reviews of JAMA Editors' Summary
I've listened to the podcast and quite frankly I am a bit surprised by the idea that the good doctor is not right to voice this program. Podcasts are not meant to be professional in most cases and therein is the beauty of them. What makes Dr. D. qualified to speak is that she is the...Read full review »
Berkhof via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 05/25/06
Her commentary isn't cute. She made a Hooters joke. Seriously this journal is too prestigious for her to be reading it. It doesn't sound professional. Even if she was hilarious, they should hire a reader.Read full review »
SoWhat via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 06/19/07
Pod cast little more than a reading of abstracts and titles of articles, not much help. Look at NEJM as an example of a useful podcast - summaries most of the articles nicely so I can select the few I really need to read completely. And if your going to to a short podcast, I think spending 10%...Read full review »
whhaymd via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 01/02/11
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »