Yuck. Gotta agree with Al.
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Her commentary isn't cute. She made a Hooters joke. Seriously this journal is too prestigious for her to be reading it. It doesn't sound professional. Even if she was hilarious, they should hire a reader.”Read full review »
SoWhat via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
06/19/07
More reviews of JAMA Editors' Summary
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Excellent quality, great personality of the editor shines through.”
Eternally12 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
04/27/10
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Dr. De Angelis should put down the mic and let someone with real speaking skills do the job of podcasting. JAMA is an important journal and her cute, homey style is not appropriate. She lacks both presentation and organization skills. (For example, doesn't bother to correctly pronounce names...”Read full review »
your pal Al via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
05/21/06
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The operative term is annoying. I used to read JAMA religiously, I pick and choose now. I keep hoping the podcast will be more informative and less preachy. Also, the inane prattling on about the cover artwork has got to end. JAMA is supposed to be about medicine. An article synopsis would be nice.”
Pestisboy via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
04/17/09
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
