not my fav
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The operative term is annoying. I used to read JAMA religiously, I pick and choose now. I keep hoping the podcast will be more informative and less preachy. Also, the inane prattling on about the cover artwork has got to end. JAMA is supposed to be about medicine. An article synopsis would be nice.”
Pestisboy via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
04/17/09
More reviews of JAMA Editors' Summary
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Excellent quality, great personality of the editor shines through.”
Eternally12 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
04/27/10
“I sort of liked Dr DeAngelis's podcast readings, not a professional voice but clear and understandable and sometimes humorous. Since she left the newer narrators are much worse, not at all enjoyable or entertaining. Annals of Internal Medicine podcast also used to be great and now stinks...”Read full review »
SkepticalWV via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/29/12
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Great place for cardiology news. This podcast does feel, at times, “anti-innovation”, and the speaker does have a bias towards or against certain practices and treatments, but overall I appreciate the scepticism and really do applaud the hard work he puts in.”
Tomthebomb92 via Apple Podcasts ·
France ·
01/22/24
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
