Recent narrators even worse than DeAngelis
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I sort of liked Dr DeAngelis's podcast readings, not a professional voice but clear and understandable and sometimes humorous. Since she left the newer narrators are much worse, not at all enjoyable or entertaining. Annals of Internal Medicine podcast also used to be great and now stinks due to lousy readers. Both journals need to get someone better!”Read full review »
SkepticalWV via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/29/12
More reviews of JAMA Editors' Summary
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I love her dry wit. She kills me...and makes the pocast great! I wasn't expecting it to be so entertaining!”Read full review »
mensetmanus via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/21/06
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Not very different from just reading abstract conclusions of various articles. Needs better audio and, while editors can write these summaries, better off finding people with better podcast voices.”
GolfFiend via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/21/21
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“It's a good journa; great articles and excellent popular interest pieces. Absolutely terrible narration. It's distractingly bad. I haven't listened in a year and really wish I could. Wish it were more like the Annals podcast; fun narration, interviews, etc”Read full review »
Impact Factor via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/30/11
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
