Needs Editing
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Regading the podcast for Vol 307, No. 2: The podcast sounds like it was recorded in brief 30 second segments and at least 2 repeat making the podcast sound like a broken record.”
MATTMT via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/28/12
More reviews of JAMA Editors' Summary
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I appreciate that Dr. DeAngelis takes the time to make this podcast both informative and entertaining. You definitely won't fall asleep listening to her! Excellent work and hope to see more podcasts from JAMA in the future.”Read full review »
huffstra via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/15/08
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The operative term is annoying. I used to read JAMA religiously, I pick and choose now. I keep hoping the podcast will be more informative and less preachy. Also, the inane prattling on about the cover artwork has got to end. JAMA is supposed to be about medicine. An article synopsis would be nice.”
Pestisboy via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
04/17/09
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The ‘host’ maters. Thank you Ed and JAMA podcast staff for this high quality output. The way your podcasts are edited and presented is an example for NEJM and Annals podcasts.
Ibrahim,
New Zealand”
Ibzal via Apple Podcasts ·
New Zealand ·
10/15/19
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
