good info but too boring
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This journal is full of great info, but I found this podcast difficult to remain focused. It could be presented in a more entertaining way.”
littlebitofall via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/17/08
More reviews of JAMA Editors' Summary
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The ‘host’ maters. Thank you Ed and JAMA podcast staff for this high quality output. The way your podcasts are edited and presented is an example for NEJM and Annals podcasts.
Ibrahim,
New Zealand”
Ibzal via Apple Podcasts ·
New Zealand ·
10/15/19
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I prefer a single voice throughout the podcast, I can understand the appeal to some of having authors speak about their articles, but it makes it harder for me to follow. I like your podcast because of the single voice format, not in spite of it.”
flyingpoodle via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
08/17/17
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Listen during my daily commute. Well organised podcast with just enough information to work out whether I need to go to the online article later. Highly recommended for busy physicians!”
PCW13 via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
12/05/17
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
