Ad hominem and boring
I have given this podcast three goes. The first one before moved to crooked. But basically this podcast consist of these alleged, serious, academic intellectuals, engaging in a series of ad hominem, abusive criticism of various conservative members of the Supreme Court. I hate to imagine the quality of their teaching.i compare it to Amicus which occasionally is very similar but more often than not it moves beyond it. But the lawfare discussion of the January 6 case is far more informative about the relative arguments. Only listen to this podcast if you think that all conservatives are just talking absolute drivel which needs no response because these people are not interested in responding to the arguments, they are just interested in abusing people.
musonius110 via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 05/06/24
More reviews of Strict Scrutiny
Great content and explanation but I do have to mention the vocal fray is excessive irritating at times.
1234inform via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 09/08/20
Pod sounds like a compelling interest, narrowly tailored to its audience.
m__a__t__t__y via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 06/21/19
I listen to several regular podcasts about the Supreme Court ans constitutional law, and I had grown tired of hearing two guys talk in a detached and uninvested way about reproductive rights cases. Strict Scrutiny was the antidote I needed. Four women with mile-long resumes, deep intelligence,...Read full review »
quasistoic via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 09/03/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »